Willo is loved for being a clean, affordable way to collect one-way video answers. SkoreCheck covers the same async-video ground, then adds automated scoring of the answers, a knowledge test, proctoring, and a single defensible verdict — with a verifiable credential for the candidate.
| SkoreCheck | Willo ↗ | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Recruiting teams submitting shortlists they can defend to a client | Teams wanting simple async video |
| Screening approach | Role-specific MCQ + proctored spoken video answers, with résumé scoring folded into one pipeline | One-way recorded video answers |
| Proctoring | Advisory signals surfaced to a reviewer — tab-switch, paste, fullscreen exit, multiple faces, attention drift | Limited |
| How the score is decided | One reconciled score — test weighted far above the résumé — plus hard verdict caps, resolving to Submit / Fix first / Reject with the reasons attached | Human-reviewed video (scorecards) |
| What you hand a client | A single labelled verdict with its reasoning, plus a verifiable candidate credential | Recorded answers and scorecards |
| Pricing model | Founding-customer pricing — talk to us | Free tier; affordable subscription |
| Setup effort | Minutes to define a role; one link to the candidate | Self-serve |
Concede the strengths: if that's your priority, Willo is a genuinely good choice.
You just need to collect one-way video answers with minimum setup.
You want a fast, proctored screen that produces a single defensible call per candidate — and a credential your client can trust.
Bring a few candidates you're unsure about. We'll show you the difference between a stack of assessment scores and a shortlist you can stand behind.