Skills, verified.

The résumé is a claim.
SkoreCheck is the proof.

SkoreCheck screens IT candidates with proctored, role-specific tests and AI scoring — so you submit people who can actually do the job, not just people who wrote a good résumé.

Early access · onboarding help included · no long-term contract
Candidate result Sample
Candidate #A‑2291
Senior Java Developer · Req IT‑4471
Submit
82 reconciled score · test weighted 80%
Java (core)
88
Spring / REST
79
SQL & data
74
Communication
80
Proctoring: clean Credential SKC‑7Q2F‑M8E1 · verifiable
The problem

A polished résumé tells you nothing anymore.

Anyone can write — or generate — a résumé that clears your bar. By the time a weak candidate reaches your client's interview, you've burned a slot, an hour, and a little bit of trust.

Résumés are inflated

AI writes fluent, keyword-perfect résumés with no real depth behind them.

Interviews are expensive

Every unqualified submittal costs your recruiters time and costs you credibility with the client.

Screening doesn't scale

Manual phone screens are slow, inconsistent, and hard to defend when a client asks "why this candidate?"

How it works

Screen on proof, not promises.

Every candidate runs the same disciplined path, so each shortlist is consistent and each decision is explainable.

STEP 01

Define the role

Set the must-have and nice-to-have skills. SkoreCheck assembles a role-specific test — MCQ for breadth, short spoken video answers for depth.

STEP 02

Candidate takes a proctored test

Send one link. They complete it remotely, on their own time. Tab-switching, pasting, and multiple faces are flagged quietly in the background.

STEP 03

Get a ranked shortlist + verdict

Every candidate returns scored, ranked, and labelled Submit / Fix first / Reject — with the reasoning attached.

Submit Fix first Reject — one clear call per candidate, defensible to your client.
Résumé scoring

The real job isn't the one on the job description.

A requirement starts drifting the moment a manager adds context — and again every time a "perfect on paper" candidate comes back rejected. SkoreCheck tracks where the target actually moved. The old way keeps scoring against the version that's already stale.

Day 1
Original JD

Senior Java Developer

JavaSpringSQL5+ yrs
The manager adds context
Intake notes

"Honestly, they must have owned a service in production and led a small team. Spring Boot specifically."

Candidates come back rejected
Rejection pattern

3 rejected — all keyword-perfect. Same reason each time: weak system design.

What the client actually wants
The true requirement

Same title. Real bar.

Production ownership System design Team lead Spring Boot keyword match
The old wayScores against the original JD
Matches keywords to the JD as first written.
Candidate AJava · Spring · SQL — flawless on paper
92%
Candidate BFewer JD keywords, ran a payments platform
64%
Submits Candidate A → client rejects: "no real ownership."
SkoreCheckScores against the true requirement
Factors in the manager's notes and the rejection pattern.
Candidate AKeyword-perfect, but no production ownership
61
Candidate BOwned a payments platform, led the rebuild
88
Surfaces Candidate B → the fit the client was actually describing.

Same résumés. Same title. A target that moved — and only one of them followed it.

SkoreCheck reads the original JD, the manager's intake notes, and the pattern in who's been rejected — and scores résumés against what the client actually wants today. The requirement it uses is visible to your recruiters, not a black box.

Why SkoreCheck

Why teams trust the score.

Built for the way agencies and recruiting teams actually work — high volume, fast turnarounds, and a client who needs to trust your judgment.

The test is ground truth

We weight real test performance far above the résumé. A strong résumé can't rescue a weak test — because the test is the only thing that can't be faked.

Proctoring is built in

Copy-paste lockouts, phone-in-frame and multi-face detection, screen recording, and a jump-to-flag review — flagged live, no separate tool to bolt on.

See everything we monitor →

Verdicts you can defend

When the test contradicts the résumé, hard rules override the number. Tell a client exactly why a candidate is a Submit or a Reject.

Fair by design

Communication is graded on clarity and structure, never on accent — screening on accent is national-origin bias, and we don't do it.

Verifiable credentials

Every pass produces a shareable credential an employer can verify online with a code — no account required.

Built for recruiters

Fast to set up, fast to read. A pipeline you scan, not a report you decode.

Industries

Built for every hire you can't afford to get wrong.

The idea travels: verify what someone can actually do before you put your name on them. Pick your field.

Live now

IT & Consulting

Screen developers, QA, and IT consultants on role-specific tests with proctoring and AI scoring — and hand your client one defensible verdict per candidate.

  • Role-specific MCQ + proctored spoken video answers
  • Résumé reconciled with the test — the test wins
  • Submit / Fix first / Reject, with the reasons attached
Roles teams screen
Java / Backend .NET Frontend Full-stack DevOps / Cloud QA / SDET Data Support / IT
Early access · in development

Healthcare & Nursing

The same proctored, prove-it screening — re-pointed at clinical readiness. A license shows someone qualified once; SkoreCheck shows they're ready for the unit today. Built now with founding healthcare partners.

  • Specialty knowledge + patient-safety judgment
  • Accent-blind communication rating
  • A credential a facility can verify — complements your compliance
Specialties in progress
ICU ER Med-Surg Telemetry OR L&D Long-term care Allied health
Proof that travels

A result your client can actually trust.

When a candidate passes, SkoreCheck issues a verifiable credential — a shareable link and code any employer can check independently. The skill, the level, the date, whether it was proctored. Proof that travels with the candidate.

Verify a credential
Verified skill credentialSkoreCheck · issued to Candidate #A‑2291
SkillSenior Java Developer
ResultPassed · 82 / 100
ProctoredYes · clean session
IssuedJul 2026
skorecheck.com/verify SKC‑7Q2F‑M8E1
How we compare

Most tools test engineers. We help you present talent with proof.

Broad assessment platforms give you a dashboard of scores. We give you one verdict you can defend to a client — so you can SkoreCheck every candidate before you submit them.

SkoreCheck vs WeCP

WeCP is a deep enterprise assessment suite with a huge question library and live coding. SkoreCheck's angle: résumé-vs-test reconciliation, defensible verdicts, lighter and faster per candidate.

Read the comparison →

SkoreCheck vs Glider AI

Glider is a broad screening automation suite — chatbots, simulations, proctoring. SkoreCheck's angle: verdict transparency, accent-blind fairness, verifiable credentials, and a pipeline you learn in one sitting.

Read the comparison →

SkoreCheck vs TestGorilla

TestGorilla has one of the largest test libraries and a free tier. SkoreCheck's angle: a proctored MCQ-plus-video screen with résumé reconciliation and one defensible verdict.

Read the comparison →

SkoreCheck vs HireVue

HireVue is the enterprise video-interview standard, sold on multi-year contracts. SkoreCheck's angle: a lightweight proctored screen that resolves to one defensible verdict — no rollout.

Read the comparison →

SkoreCheck vs HackerRank

HackerRank is the go-to for deep coding screens. SkoreCheck's angle: screen any role with proctored video and résumé reconciliation, resolved to one defensible verdict.

Read the comparison →

SkoreCheck vs Spark Hire

Spark Hire is a popular one-way video tool, now with AI scoring. SkoreCheck's angle: a proctored knowledge test alongside the video, résumé reconciliation, and one defensible verdict.

Read the comparison →

SkoreCheck vs Vervoe

Vervoe AI-grades skills and job simulations and auto-ranks candidates. SkoreCheck's angle: proctoring integrity, résumé reconciliation, and one defensible verdict at the end.

Read the comparison →

SkoreCheck vs Adaface

Adaface offers a friendly conversational test with transparent credit pricing. SkoreCheck's angle: proctored spoken video, résumé reconciliation, and one defensible verdict.

Read the comparison →

SkoreCheck vs Willo

Willo is a simple, affordable async video tool. SkoreCheck's angle: score the video, add a proctored knowledge test and résumé reconciliation, and resolve to one defensible verdict.

Read the comparison →

SkoreCheck vs TestDome

TestDome offers transparent pay-per-candidate tests with proctoring. SkoreCheck's angle: scored spoken video, résumé reconciliation, and one defensible verdict.

Read the comparison →

SkoreCheck vs Karat

Karat runs human technical interviews for you. SkoreCheck's angle: the affordable automated screen before that — proctored, résumé-reconciled, one defensible verdict.

Read the comparison →

SkoreCheck vs iMocha

iMocha is an enterprise skills-intelligence platform. SkoreCheck's angle: a focused, fast per-requisition screen — proctored, résumé-reconciled, one defensible verdict.

Read the comparison →

SkoreCheck vs Testlify

Testlify is an affordable all-roles assessment tool with async video. SkoreCheck's angle: proctored spoken video, résumé reconciliation, and one defensible verdict with a credential.

Read the comparison →

SkoreCheck vs Codility

Codility is rigorous, defensible coding assessment for enterprises. SkoreCheck's angle: screen any role with proctored video and résumé reconciliation, resolved to one defensible verdict.

Read the comparison →
Pricing

Simple plans. Credits that make sense.

Every plan includes the full screening toolkit. You spend credits as you screen — 1 credit = $1 — so you only pay for the candidates you actually run.

Starter
$99/mo
250 credits / month
≈ 25 full screenings

For small teams and occasional hiring.

Request access
Scale
$299/mo
800 credits / month
≈ 80 full screenings · best value

For high-volume recruiting teams.

Request access
Enterprise
Custom
Volume credits
SSO · security review · dedicated support

For large orgs with security and volume needs.

Talk to us
Proctored skills tests AI résumé scoring Verifiable credentials Human-reviewed verdicts

What a credit buys

Flat, per-action — 1 credit = $1.
  • Full screening — MCQ + proctored video + AI scoring 10 credits
  • MCQ-only screen 4 credits
  • Résumé rating 1 credit

Buy credits anytime

Top up when you need more — top-up credits don't expire for 12 months.
  • 100 credits $69
  • 300 credits $179
  • 600 credits $329

Monthly credits refresh each month; top-up credits carry over for 12 months. All prices in USD. Larger teams and dedicated deployments — talk to us.

Request access

Ready to see a real requisition become a real result?

We're onboarding a small group of founding recruiting teams. Bring the candidates you're unsure about, and see exactly where they stand — before you put your name on them.

  • Hands-on onboarding for your first roles
  • A direct line to the people building it
  • Founding-customer pricing that won't change under you

Get early access

We'll reply personally, usually within one business day.
No long-term contract · onboarding help included

Don't just screen them. SkoreCheck them.